%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Metadata 2 0 R
/Pages 3 0 R
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Creator (Nuance Communications, Inc.)
/Producer (Nuance Communications, Inc.)
/ModDate (05-17-2011)
/CreationDate (05-17-2011)
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Type /Metadata
/Subtype /XML
/Length 5 0 R
>>
stream
application/pdf
Nuance Communications, Inc.
2011-05-17T18:10:16-04:00
2011-05-17T18:10:16-04:00
2011-05-17T18:10:16-04:00
Nuance Communications, Inc.
uuid:04607ca7-8e64-4f28-ac9a-f1dfef60b59b
uuid:49997c22-d7d3-41ea-bcc1-da77c842d71f
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Type /Pages
/Count 14
/Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R
16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R]
>>
endobj
5 0 obj
3437
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 23 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 27 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 31 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 35 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 39 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 43 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 47 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 51 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 55 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 59 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 63 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 67 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 71 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Contents [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R]
/Type /Page
/Resources 75 0 R
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/eCpyResolution 300
/Rotate 0
/Annots []
>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/Length 76 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/Length 77 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im7 Do Q
q
497.28 0.00 0.00 195.84 65.28 524.16 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im8 Do Q
q
441.60 0.00 0.00 170.88 65.28 439.68 cm
0.15 0.15 0.15 rg
/Im9 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F10 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
192.25 708.00 TD
(IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) Tj
99 Tz
47.75 -13.70 TD
(DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) Tj
100 Tz
-170.65 -53.50 TD
(IN RE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS AD ) Tj
2000 Tz
206.40 0.25 TD
(\t) Tj
94 Tz
52.10 -.25 TD
(Case No. ) Tj
100 Tz
-258.50 -13.70 TD
(TESTIFICANDUM ) Tj
99 Tz
-.25 -28.05 TD
(Nokia Corporation, ) Tj
97 Tz
145.20 -27.60 TD
(Plaintiff, ) Tj
/F10 8.00 Tf
103 Tz
-36.20 -13.95 TD
(V. ) Tj
2000 Tz
8.15 4.95 TD
(\t) Tj
/F10 12.00 Tf
98 Tz
141.60 -4.70 TD
(Case No. District of Delaware ) Tj
97 Tz
48.25 -13.90 TD
(Civil Action No. 1 :09-cv-00791- GMS ) Tj
99 Tz
-306.75 -13.70 TD
(Apple Inc., ) Tj
97 Tz
144.95 -27.35 TD
(Defendant. ) Tj
/F11 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
-100.30 -46.10 TD
(NONPARTIES' MOTION TO QUASH NOKIA SUBPOENAS AND FOR A ) Tj
132.70 -13.90 TD
(PROTECTIVE ORDER ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
22 0 obj
<<
/Length 78 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x;0w-0~0*
,A%NnA)OQ:^Ag/=BɶzGpMTbxoO^2c9U]0bnR-)
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<<
/XObject 79 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 80 0 R
>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/Length 81 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<<
/Length 82 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im15 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im16 Do Q
q
155.52 0.00 0.00 17.28 232.32 647.04 cm
0.17 0.17 0.17 rg
/Im17 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F18 14.00 Tf
99 Tz
234.50 649.90 TD
(TABLE OF CONTENTS ) Tj
/F19 12.00 Tf
81 Tz
-159.40 -30.70 TD
(I. ) Tj
1654 Tz
5.80 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
100 Tz
16.55 0.70 TD
(Introduction .............................................................................................................................3 ) Tj
87 Tz
-22.35 -28.30 TD
(II. ) Tj
2000 Tz
9.85 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
100 Tz
23.55 0.95 TD
(Background and Summary of Argument.............................................................................3 ) Tj
92 Tz
-33.15 -28.30 TD
(III. ) Tj
1938 Tz
13.95 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
100 Tz
19.40 0.70 TD
(Legal Argument...................................................................................................................7 ) Tj
99 Tz
-21.10 -28.30 TD
(A.) Tj
32.15 0.95 TD
(The Shelton Standard for Deposing Opposing Party's Counsel Applies Because the ) Tj
-32.15 -27.60 TD
(Apple Attorneys Are Dealing with Invalidity Challenges in the Pending Reexaminations That ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(Are Also at Issue in the Litigation..............................................................................................8 ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -28.30 TD
(B.) Tj
32.15 0.70 TD
(All Nonprivileged Information That Nokia Seeks Can Be Obtained from Other More-) Tj
100 Tz
-32.15 -27.35 TD
(Accessible and Less-Burdensome Sources.................................................................................9 ) Tj
99 Tz
0.45 -28.55 TD
(C.) Tj
31.95 1.20 TD
(The Information Nokia Seeks Is Neither Relevant Nor Crucial ....................................11 ) Tj
100 Tz
-31.95 -28.80 TD
(D.) Tj
31.70 0.95 TD
(Nokia Will Encounter Privileged Information by Deposing the Apple Attorneys........12 ) Tj
93 Tz
-43.90 -28.55 TD
(IV. ) Tj
1900 Tz
14.60 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
100 Tz
19.00 0.95 TD
(Conclusion.........................................................................................................................13 ) Tj
133 Tz
192.45 -306.00 TD
(-2- ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<<
/Length 83 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x;0w-0%*
,A%N?;Ռ() N'hZer<#$;[RZc7N]NW Kޱb4TUa1jrR-
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/XObject 84 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 85 0 R
>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<<
/Length 86 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<<
/Length 87 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im23 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im24 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.15 0.15 0.15 rg
/Im25 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F26 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
75.35 680.15 TD
(I.) Tj
93 Tz
36.25 0.00 TD
(Introduction ) Tj
/F27 12.00 Tf
102 Tz
0.50 -25.65 TD
(Robert Greene Sterne, Glenn Perry, Rich Coller, and Salvador Bezos, of the law firm ) Tj
99 Tz
-35.80 -27.60 TD
(Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C., \(collectively, the "Apple Attorneys"\) move this Court ) Tj
103 Tz
-.45 -27.40 TD
(to quash deposition subpoenas) Tj
28 Tz
157.45 5.30 TD
(] ) Tj
111 Tz
1.40 -5.50 TD
( served on them by Nokia and to enter a protective order, ) Tj
107 Tz
-159.10 -27.40 TD
(pursuant to Rule 26\(c\) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, barring Nokia from further ) Tj
100 Tz
0.50 -27.60 TD
(attempts to discover information through the Apple Attorneys. This motion is necessary because ) Tj
100 Tz
-.75 -27.35 TD
(Nokia has subpoenaed the Apple Attorneys who are representing Apple in connection with the ) Tj
100 Tz
0.50 -27.60 TD
(very patents Apple has asserted against Nokia in the underlying litigation, pending in the District ) Tj
109 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Court for Delaware. The law prohibits a party from deposing its opponent's lawyer if the ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(information it seeks to obtain is available through another source, and the information Nokia is ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(attempting to discover is available through other, non-attorney sources. Nokia has not attempted ) Tj
102 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(to obtain the information through those sources and instead made its first and only attempt to ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(discover this information through the Apple Attorneys. And the information Nokia is seeking to ) Tj
104 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(discover through the Apple Attorneys is irrelevant and largely protected from disclosure by ) Tj
100 Tz
-.50 -27.35 TD
(privilege. The Court should quash the subpoenas and issue a protective order. ) Tj
/F26 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
-.25 -28.10 TD
(II.) Tj
94 Tz
36.50 0.00 TD
(Background and Summary ) Tj
/F26 11.00 Tf
124 Tz
137.75 0.25 TD
(of ) Tj
/F26 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
11.75 0.00 TD
(Argument ) Tj
/F27 12.00 Tf
102 Tz
-149.50 -25.65 TD
(Nokia sued Apple for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the District of ) Tj
97 Tz
-36.00 -27.60 TD
(Delaware. ) Tj
/F28 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
53.05 0.20 TD
(See Nokia Corporation v. Apple Inc., Civil ) Tj
/F27 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
216.20 0.00 TD
(Action No. 1 :09-cv-00791-GMS. Apple ) Tj
-268.80 -27.60 TD
(counterclaimed asserting that Nokia infringed nine of its patents. On April 28, 2010, an attorney ) Tj
103 Tz
49.45 -79.65 TD
(The subpoenas are attached here as Exhibits 1-4. These subpoenas also sought the ) Tj
101 Tz
-49.65 -13.95 TD
(production of documents from the Apple Attorneys. All responsive, nonprivileged documents ) Tj
98 Tz
0.00 -13.90 TD
(have been produced. ) Tj
135 Tz
224.85 -42.25 TD
(-3- ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<<
/Length 88 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x;0w-0:J~AO6
NݟnA)OY8Z Y2THk_s:l3,p2ZX O&;R~.!
endstream
endobj
31 0 obj
<<
/XObject 89 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 90 0 R
>>
endobj
32 0 obj
<<
/Length 91 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<<
/Length 92 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im32 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im33 Do Q
q
472.32 0.00 0.00 19.20 71.04 535.68 cm
0.15 0.15 0.15 rg
/Im34 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F35 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
73.20 706.30 TD
(from Brient IP Law filed ) Tj
/F36 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
127.20 0.50 TD
(ex parte ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
43.70 0.70 TD
(reexamination requests on behalf of an anonymous requester ) Tj
99 Tz
-170.90 -28.05 TD
(against all nine patents that Apple asserted in counterclaims against Nokia. ) Tj
111 Tz
36.00 -27.35 TD
(Nokia served deposition subpoenas on all of the Apple Attorneys, each of whom ) Tj
100 Tz
-36.00 -27.60 TD
(represent Apple Inc. in the reexaminations of six of the nine the patents Apple asserted against ) Tj
101 Tz
-.25 -28.10 TD
(Nokia in the underlying litigation.) Tj
55 Tz
170.65 0.25 TD
(2 ) Tj
103 Tz
3.35 0.45 TD
( Four of these reexaminations are on-going, including one ) Tj
112 Tz
-173.50 -28.05 TD
(reexamination which is still in the early stages of prosecution.) Tj
50 Tz
336.45 0.45 TD
(3 ) Tj
119 Tz
3.15 0.25 TD
( The Apple Attorneys' ) Tj
99 Tz
-339.60 -28.05 TD
(prosecution of these patent reexaminations is closely tied to the issues in the underlying litigation ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.40 TD
(because the basis of the validity challenges to the patents are largely the same in both. A patent ) Tj
100 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(reexamination is a challenge to the patentability of a patent before the United States Patent and ) Tj
109 Tz
0.20 -27.35 TD
(Trademark Office \(the "Office"\). Because patent reexaminations provide accused patent ) Tj
0.25 -27.85 TD
(infringers two bites at the invalidity appleone in the District Court and the other at the ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.35 TD
(Officedefendants often request patent reexaminations of the patents-in-suit as a defense tactic ) Tj
107 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(in patent litigations. This case is no different. Although the reexaminations handled by the ) Tj
100 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Apple Attorneys were anonymously requested, the evidence shows that Nokia likely requested ) Tj
102 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(the reexaminations of the patents Apple asserted against Nokia as Nokia is the only counter-) Tj
98 Tz
0.50 -28.30 TD
(claim defendant for these patents. ) Tj
111 Tz
36.45 -26.65 TD
(The Court should quash these subpoenas and enter a protective order barring the ) Tj
102 Tz
-36.25 -27.60 TD
(depositions. Nokia may depose the Apple Attorneys only if it can show \(1\) the information it ) Tj
/F35 8.50 Tf
82 Tz
36.50 -51.85 TD
(2 ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
108 Tz
3.60 -4.30 TD
( Those reexaminations are \(1\) Control No. 90/010,964, involving U.S. Patent No. ) Tj
/F36 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
-39.35 -15.15 TD
(5,634,074; ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
102 Tz
55.90 0.75 TD
(\(2\) Control No. 90/010,967, involving U.S. Patent No. ) Tj
/F36 12.00 Tf
94 Tz
279.85 0.95 TD
(5,315,703; ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
55.45 0.25 TD
(\(3\) Control No. ) Tj
/F36 12.00 Tf
98 Tz
-391.45 -15.60 TD
(90/010,965, ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
61.70 0.45 TD
(involving U.S. Patent No. ) Tj
/F36 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
131.25 0.50 TD
(5,455,854; ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
101 Tz
59.05 0.70 TD
(\(4\) Control No. 90/010,966, involving U.S. ) Tj
98 Tz
-252.25 -15.60 TD
(Patent No. ) Tj
/F36 12.00 Tf
54.95 0.25 TD
(6,239,795; \(5\) ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
72.00 1.45 TD
(Control No. 90/010,970, involving U.S. Patent No. 6,189,034; and \(6\) ) Tj
-126.45 -14.65 TD
(Control No. 90/010,969, involving U.S. Patent No. ) Tj
/F36 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
251.25 0.75 TD
(7,383,453. ) Tj
/F35 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
-209.25 -20.20 TD
(In three of the four pending reexaminations, the Reexam Certificate has not issued ) Tj
-42.00 -13.65 TD
(although the Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate has been mailed. Control Nos. ) Tj
0.25 -14.90 TD
(90/010,964; 90/010,967; and 90/010,969. ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<<
/Length 93 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x@b=We!&XƕnA)O٨8L:>3h+7> ,4l[#&Msʛ`7q9y`9SEZM* .
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<<
/XObject 94 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 95 0 R
>>
endobj
36 0 obj
<<
/Length 96 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<<
/Length 97 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im40 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im41 Do Q
q
119.04 0.00 0.00 17.28 109.44 151.68 cm
0.15 0.15 0.15 rg
/Im42 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F43 12.00 Tf
103 Tz
75.35 708.00 TD
(seeks can only be obtained by deposing the Apple Attorneys; \(2\) the information it seeks by ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(deposing the Apple Attorneys is both relevant and nonprivileged; and \(3\) the information it seeks ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(is crucial to the case. Nokia cannot satisfy any of these elements. ) Tj
104 Tz
36.50 -27.60 TD
(First, the prosecution of these reexaminations was done on the written record that is ) Tj
101 Tz
-36.25 -27.60 TD
(found in the file histories of each reexamination. This written record includes the substance of ) Tj
107 Tz
-.45 -27.35 TD
(the in-person interviews held in each of the reexaminationsboth the examiner and Apple ) Tj
101 Tz
0.70 -27.60 TD
(submitted a written interview summary for each interview conducted in these reexaminations. ) Tj
-.50 -27.35 TD
(And, even assuming that this written record of the interviews was insufficient, Nokia can still ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(discover the substance of the interviews by deposing the examiner or inventors, who were also ) Tj
101 Tz
-.25 -27.40 TD
(present at the interviews. Nokia has also subpoenaed documents from the Apple Attorneys. In ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.80 TD
(response to those document subpoenas, the Apple Attorneys have provided all requested prior art ) Tj
0.00 -27.40 TD
(present in their files of these reexaminations. ) Tj
112 Tz
37.20 -27.80 TD
(Second, the only other information that Nokia seeks to discover from the Apple ) Tj
104 Tz
-36.95 -27.40 TD
(Attorneys is protected from disclosure by the attorneyclient privilege or the work-product ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(doctrine. The only non-privileged information known by these attorneys is already in the public ) Tj
0.00 -27.60 TD
(domain in the file histories of the patents-in-suit and the file histories of the reexaminations. The ) Tj
-.25 -27.60 TD
(reason for that is simple: all prosecution of these patents is done on the written record. 37 C.F.R. ) Tj
111 Tz
0.75 -27.35 TD
( 1.2. The remaining communications and information, such as Apple Attorneys' client ) Tj
-.50 -27.60 TD
(communications, internal communications, and mental impressions, are protected from ) Tj
97 Tz
0.25 -27.85 TD
(disclosure. ) Tj
103 Tz
36.25 -27.35 TD
(Third, any information outside the file histories of the patents in reexamination is not ) Tj
102 Tz
-36.25 -27.60 TD
(relevant, let alone crucial, to this suit. Those file histories contain the complete record of the ) Tj
107 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(Office's determination as to the patentability of those patents. And, because Nokia has not ) Tj
/F44 11.50 Tf
137 Tz
224.40 -63.35 TD
(-5- ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<<
/Length 98 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x@b=ȺhKp!VgIUJ/
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<<
/XObject 99 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 100 0 R
>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<<
/Length 101 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
41 0 obj
<<
/Length 102 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im48 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im49 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F50 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
75.85 707.50 TD
(alleged inequitable conduct in this case, the mental impressions of the Apple Attorneys are not ) Tj
100 Tz
-.50 -27.80 TD
(relevant and would be protected as attorney-work product in any event. Indeed, Nokia has never ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(explained why the information it seeks is relevant to any claim or defense in this suit. The only ) Tj
109 Tz
0.25 -27.40 TD
(issue that Nokia has articulated as being nonprivileged is the substance of the interviews ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(conducted by the Apple Attorneys with the Office during the reexaminations of the patents-in-) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.35 TD
(suit, but Nokia has never explained why it needs any more than the interview summaries that are ) Tj
99 Tz
-.50 -27.60 TD
(publicly available. ) Tj
103 Tz
36.95 -27.60 TD
(Counsel for the Apple Attorneys objected to the subpoenas and explained to Nokia's ) Tj
100 Tz
-36.70 -27.35 TD
(counsel in follow-up communications that Nokia was not entitled to take the depositions.) Tj
57 Tz
441.35 -.25 TD
(4 ) Tj
101 Tz
3.60 0.00 TD
( The ) Tj
100 Tz
-445.20 -27.35 TD
(Apple Attorneys also advised that the deposition dates noticed in the subpoenas conflicted with ) Tj
103 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(each Apple Attorney's calendar and they could not appear on the noticed dates in any event. ) Tj
100 Tz
-.70 -27.60 TD
(Nevertheless, counsel for the Apple Attorneys attempted a compromise on acceptable deposition ) Tj
108 Tz
0.45 -27.60 TD
(topics with Nokia's counsel ) Tj
/F50 3.00 Tf
144 Tz
145.20 0.00 TD
(.) Tj
204 Tz
2.65 0.00 TD
(5 ) Tj
/F50 12.00 Tf
112 Tz
3.10 0.00 TD
( Hoping to avoid filing this motion, counsel for the Apple ) Tj
107 Tz
-150.95 -27.60 TD
(Attorneys suggested that Nokia narrow the scope of the information on which it wanted to ) Tj
100 Tz
0.50 -27.35 TD
(conduct depositions and proposed that the parties proceed under Rule 30\(b\)\(6\), so that agreeable ) Tj
0.00 -27.60 TD
(deposition topics could be identified in advance of any deposition. Because Nokia refused these ) Tj
100 Tz
0.00 -27.85 TD
(suggestions and did not narrow the scope of its subpoenas, the Apple Attorneys and Nokia did ) Tj
110 Tz
-.25 -27.35 TD
(not identify new dates for the depositions that did not conflict with the Apple Attorney's ) Tj
97 Tz
0.25 -27.85 TD
(schedules.) Tj
55 Tz
49.90 0.00 TD
(6 ) Tj
/F50 3.00 Tf
100 Tz
3.35 0.00 TD
( ) Tj
/F51 12.00 Tf
92 Tz
-3.10 -63.85 TD
(See ) Tj
/F50 12.00 Tf
103 Tz
21.85 0.25 TD
(Letter from Byron Pickard, Apple Attorneys' counsel, to Rohan Kale, Nokia's ) Tj
99 Tz
-72.00 -13.90 TD
(counsel \(April 8, 2011\), attached hereto as Exhibit ) Tj
/F51 12.00 Tf
82 Tz
246.00 0.00 TD
(5. ) Tj
92 Tz
-199.95 -19.95 TD
(See Id. ) Tj
/F50 8.00 Tf
85 Tz
-9.60 -14.40 TD
(6 ) Tj
/F51 12.00 Tf
150 Tz
3.40 -5.50 TD
( See ) Tj
/F50 12.00 Tf
110 Tz
38.85 0.25 TD
(Emails between Rohan Kale, Nokia's counsel, and Byron Pickard, Apple ) Tj
99 Tz
-78.70 -13.95 TD
(Attorneys' counsel, attached hereto as Exhibits 6 & 7. ) Tj
/F52 5.00 Tf
85 Tz
233.05 -41.75 TD
(S ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<<
/Length 103 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x@b=hKp!VgI>
endobj
44 0 obj
<<
/Length 106 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<<
/Length 107 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im56 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im57 Do Q
q
474.24 0.00 0.00 17.28 71.04 566.40 cm
0.15 0.15 0.15 rg
/Im58 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F59 11.00 Tf
125 Tz
73.70 706.55 TD
(III. LegalArgument ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
36.95 -24.70 TD
(The Subpoenas should be quashed and a protective order should be entered because the ) Tj
100 Tz
-36.25 -27.60 TD
(depositions sought are neither appropriate nor necessary. Although parties may obtain discovery ) Tj
103 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to a party's claim or defense, courts have ) Tj
102 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(discretion to limit the scope of discovery when it is cumulative or can be obtained from other ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -27.35 TD
(more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive sources. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26\(b\)\(l\)-\(2\). The ) Tj
100 Tz
0.50 -27.40 TD
(Court may also limit discovery "for good cause" and "issue an order to protect a party or person ) Tj
112 Tz
0.00 -27.80 TD
(from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense," including ) Tj
100 Tz
0.45 -27.85 TD
("forbidding the discovery." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26\(c\)\(1\). ) Tj
101 Tz
35.80 -27.35 TD
(Deposing an opposing party's attorney is disfavored. ) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
270.95 0.45 TD
(See, e.g., Shelton v. Am. Motors ) Tj
-306.75 -28.80 TD
(Corp., 805 ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
56.90 0.50 TD
(F.2d 1323, 1327 \(8th Cir. 1986\); ) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
166.10 0.45 TD
(Evans v. Atwood, ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
89.50 0.25 TD
(No. CIV.A. 96-2746, 1999 WL ) Tj
100 Tz
-311.75 -28.55 TD
(1032811, at ) Tj
88 Tz
62.15 1.90 TD
(*2 ) Tj
102 Tz
10.80 -.95 TD
( \(D.D.C. Sept. 29, 1999\) \("[A] party seeking to depose its adversary's counsel ) Tj
100 Tz
-73.90 -28.05 TD
(must demonstrate the propriety of and need for such a deposition."\); ) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
339.35 0.70 TD
(Corp. for Public Broad. v. ) Tj
-340.10 -28.55 TD
(Am. Auto. Centennial Comm'n, ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
102 Tz
160.35 0.70 TD
(No. 1:97CV01810, 1999 WL 1815561, at ) Tj
79 Tz
214.80 2.15 TD
(*1 ) Tj
107 Tz
9.60 -1.90 TD
( \(D.D.C. Feb. 2, ) Tj
102 Tz
-382.80 -28.10 TD
(1999\). The D.C. Circuit has not addressed what standard should be applied for depositions of ) Tj
99 Tz
-.75 -27.35 TD
(attorneys representing a party in reexaminations that are concurrent with a pending litigation, but ) Tj
100 Tz
-.45 -27.60 TD
(the standard for deposing opposing party's counsel as articulated by the Eighth Circuit in ) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
432.45 0.50 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
98 Tz
-432.00 -28.55 TD
(v. American Motors Corp. ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
131.75 0.70 TD
(should be applied in this case and has been favorably applied or cited ) Tj
99 Tz
-131.75 -28.30 TD
(by this Court in deciding similar issues. ) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
194.65 0.70 TD
(See, e.g., Corp. for Public Broad., ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
98 Tz
169.20 0.25 TD
(1999 WL 1815561, at ) Tj
80 Tz
-363.10 -27.15 TD
(*1) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
54 Tz
12.00 0.00 TD
(; ) Tj
98 Tz
1.90 -1.65 TD
( Evans, ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
41.05 0.45 TD
(1999 WL 1032811, at ) Tj
87 Tz
108.95 3.60 TD
(*3; ) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
13.90 -3.10 TD
( but see United States v. Philip Morris Inc., ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
214.10 0.25 TD
(No. Civ. A. 99-) Tj
104 Tz
-392.40 -27.85 TD
(2496, 209 F.R.D. 13, 16-18 \(D.D.C. Aug. 23, 2002\) \(limiting the application of the ) Tj
/F61 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
432.00 0.50 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F60 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
-431.75 -28.10 TD
(factors to trial and litigation counsel or where there was a risk of exposing litigation strategy\). ) Tj
133 Tz
225.10 -92.65 TD
(-7- ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<<
/Length 108 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x@b=r%>*1hKp!VgI<0j^r+BٶzGpCT粵7n)>>2rxj9SF(\]AJ0
endstream
endobj
47 0 obj
<<
/XObject 109 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 110 0 R
>>
endobj
48 0 obj
<<
/Length 111 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
49 0 obj
<<
/Length 112 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im65 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im66 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F67 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
109.20 707.30 TD
(A. ) Tj
2000 Tz
10.80 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
91 Tz
27.10 0.00 TD
(The ) Tj
/F68 11.50 Tf
100 Tz
22.35 0.00 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F67 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
41.50 0.00 TD
(Standard for Deposing Opposing Party's Counsel Applies Because ) Tj
101 Tz
-64.55 -13.70 TD
(the Apple Attorneys Are Dealing with Invalidity Challenges in the Pending ) Tj
94 Tz
-.50 -13.90 TD
(Reexaminations That Are Also at Issue in the Litigation ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
-35.75 -25.45 TD
(The ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
22.80 0.00 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
41.05 0.00 TD
(standard limits depositions of opposing party's counsel to situations where ) Tj
101 Tz
-99.85 -27.60 TD
(\(1\) the party seeking the deposition can only obtain the information by deposing the opposing ) Tj
100 Tz
-.45 -27.60 TD
(party's counsel; \(2\) the information sought is relevant and nonprivileged; and \(3\) the information ) Tj
98 Tz
0.45 -27.60 TD
(is crucial to the case. ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
106.35 0.00 TD
(Philip Morris, ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
72.20 0.25 TD
(203 F.R.D. at 15 \(citing ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
116.90 -.25 TD
(Shelton, 805 ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
63.35 0.00 TD
(F.2d at 1327\). ) Tj
-322.55 -27.35 TD
(The ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
22.80 0.00 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
101 Tz
41.05 0.00 TD
(standard does not apply to all depositions of the opposing party's counsel. ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
-100.55 -27.60 TD
(See Philip Morris, ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
92.85 0.00 TD
(209 F.R.D. at ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
92 Tz
70.10 0.20 TD
(15-18. ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
36.45 -.20 TD
(In ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
13.00 0.20 TD
(Philip Morris, ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
72.20 -.20 TD
(this Court noted that ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
103.45 0.00 TD
("Shelton ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
42.95 0.00 TD
(was not ) Tj
100 Tz
-430.55 -27.40 TD
(intended to provide heightened protection to attorneys who represented a client in ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
408.95 0.00 TD
(a completed ) Tj
-409.20 -27.80 TD
(case ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
112 Tz
28.60 0.20 TD
(and then also happened to represent that same client in a pending case where the ) Tj
99 Tz
-28.35 -27.60 TD
(information ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
60.95 0.00 TD
(known only ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
59.80 0.25 TD
(by the attorneys regarding the prior concluded case was crucial." ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
86 Tz
321.60 -.25 TD
(Id. ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
92 Tz
17.25 0.00 TD
(at ) Tj
100 Tz
-458.65 -27.60 TD
(17 \(quoting ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
102 Tz
60.75 0.25 TD
(Pamida, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc., ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
104 Tz
184.55 0.00 TD
(281 F.3d 726, 730-31 \(8th Cir. 2002\)\). The ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
102 Tz
-246.70 -27.85 TD
(Philip Morris ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
72.45 0.25 TD
(court concluded that ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
104.40 0.00 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
101 Tz
41.05 0.00 TD
(should be limited to depositions of trial counsel or ) Tj
100 Tz
-217.45 -27.60 TD
(counsel directly representing the party in the pending litigation and when the deposition would ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.85 TD
(reveal litigation strategy in the pending case. ) Tj
/F70 12.00 Tf
86 Tz
218.40 0.25 TD
(Id. ) Tj
/F69 12.00 Tf
87 Tz
16.35 0.00 TD
(at * 18. ) Tj
101 Tz
-198.50 -27.60 TD
(Here, the Apple Attorneys directly represent Apple in four reexaminations that are on-) Tj
110 Tz
-36.00 -27.60 TD
(going and have not concluded. These reexaminations are an extension of the underlying ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(litigation and were likely initiated by Nokia. The harm to Apple from having its reexamination ) Tj
102 Tz
-.25 -27.35 TD
(counsel deposed is no less harmful than if the Apple Attorneys were litigation counsel in the ) Tj
100 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(underlying litigation. Similar to Apple's litigation counsel in the underlying litigation, the Apple ) Tj
102 Tz
0.00 -27.35 TD
(Attorneys advocate the validity of the patents-in-suit, except before the Office instead of the ) Tj
101 Tz
0.25 -27.85 TD
(Court. Many of the same validity issues raised during the reexaminations will be raised in the ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(underlying litigation. Effective prosecution of the reexaminations is an essential component to ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<<
/Length 113 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x@b=j髲sm .J|L7 lUF_[Z 3d+ܐ&ƹltoϰ.e˹#V+p1V* 0
endstream
endobj
51 0 obj
<<
/XObject 114 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 115 0 R
>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<<
/Length 116 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
53 0 obj
<<
/Length 117 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im74 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im75 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F76 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
75.35 707.30 TD
(the underlying litigation; if the patent is ultimately determined to be invalid, Apple cannot assert ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(that patent against any infringer, including Nokia. ) Tj
100 Tz
36.75 -27.60 TD
(Because the validity issues raised by patent reexaminations are largely the same as those ) Tj
100 Tz
-36.25 -27.60 TD
(in the underlying litigation, Nokia will likely encounter issues common to the litigation during ) Tj
-.50 -27.60 TD
(the depositions of the Apple Attorneys, which could impermissibly allow Nokia to inquire into ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.40 TD
(Apple's strategies regarding its patents. ) Tj
/F77 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
196.80 0.00 TD
(See Philip Morris, ) Tj
/F76 12.00 Tf
92.40 -.20 TD
(209 F.R.D. at 17-18 \("The animating ) Tj
107 Tz
-288.95 -27.40 TD
(concern of ) Tj
/F77 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
59.75 0.00 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F76 12.00 Tf
108 Tz
42.25 0.00 TD
(is that discovery rules must not be used-or abused-to 'enable a learned ) Tj
100 Tz
-102.25 -27.60 TD
(profession to perform its functions. . . on wits borrowed from the adversary."\) ) Tj
101 Tz
36.75 -27.35 TD
(Further, the Apple Attorneys are not the only source of any nonprivileged information ) Tj
103 Tz
-37.20 -27.60 TD
(Nokia seeks. Such information is available through non-attorney witnesses, for example, the ) Tj
108 Tz
0.70 -27.60 TD
(examiners and the inventors, and from publically available sources such as the patent file ) Tj
99 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(wrappers as further discussed below. ) Tj
103 Tz
36.75 -27.35 TD
(Thus, deposing the Apple Attorneys would result in the same kind of harassment and ) Tj
100 Tz
-37.00 -27.60 TD
(prejudice as would result from deposing Apple's litigation counsel, and thus the ) Tj
/F77 12.00 Tf
94 Tz
388.80 -.25 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F76 12.00 Tf
39.60 0.25 TD
(standard ) Tj
100 Tz
-427.65 -27.85 TD
(should apply in this case. Applying the ) Tj
/F77 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
195.85 0.25 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F76 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
39.80 0.00 TD
(standard, the Subpoenas seeking the depositions ) Tj
110 Tz
-235.90 -27.60 TD
(of the Apple Attorneys should be quashed and a protective order should be entered. The ) Tj
103 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(information Nokia seeks can be obtained from other sources, the information Nokia seeks is ) Tj
99 Tz
0.25 -27.35 TD
(largely privileged and irrelevant, and the information is not crucial to any issue in this case. ) Tj
/F78 12.00 Tf
87 Tz
35.75 -55.45 TD
(B. ) Tj
2000 Tz
9.85 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
98 Tz
25.65 0.00 TD
(All Nonprivileged Information That Nokia Seeks Can Be Obtained from Other ) Tj
97 Tz
0.25 -13.70 TD
(More-Accessible and Less-Burdensome Sources ) Tj
/F76 12.00 Tf
99 Tz
-35.25 -25.90 TD
(Under the ) Tj
/F77 12.00 Tf
94 Tz
51.80 0.25 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F76 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
40.35 0.00 TD
(standard, the party seeking to depose counsel first must show that the ) Tj
-128.65 -27.60 TD
(information cannot be obtained through other sources. ) Tj
/F77 12.00 Tf
94 Tz
269.50 0.25 TD
(Shelton, ) Tj
/F76 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
43.00 -.25 TD
(805 F.2d at 1327. Nokia cannot ) Tj
103 Tz
-312.50 -27.60 TD
(make that showing because everything relevant to the reexamination of the patents-in-suit is ) Tj
/F79 12.50 Tf
62 Tz
224.90 -51.60 TD
(MOR ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
54 0 obj
<<
/Length 118 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x@b=b髲sm ,J|L7ɠlTF_k3h#7|@Xhɶ|GpMTܛ`Wa8tXy`9SFp1՛U
1
endstream
endobj
55 0 obj
<<
/XObject 119 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 120 0 R
>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<<
/Length 121 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
57 0 obj
<<
/Length 122 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im83 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im84 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F85 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
74.65 708.25 TD
(contained the publicly available file wrappers. Under the Patent Office's rules, all business with ) Tj
-.25 -27.85 TD
(the Patent Office must be conducted in writing. 37 C.F.R. 1.2. This requirement is significant; ) Tj
99 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(everything relevant to patentability in these reexaminations must be and is in the file histories for ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -28.55 TD
(these patents. ) Tj
/F86 12.00 Tf
91 Tz
75.85 0.25 TD
(See ) Tj
/F85 12.00 Tf
104 Tz
21.60 0.95 TD
(37 C.F.R. 1.2 \("The action of the Patent and Trademark Office will be ) Tj
99 Tz
-97.20 -27.85 TD
(based exclusively on the written record in the Office."\); M.P.E.P 2281. ) Tj
100 Tz
36.70 -27.35 TD
(The requirement that prosecution proceed on the written record applies to the interviews ) Tj
109 Tz
-36.45 -27.60 TD
(as well. The Office cannot conduct business in writing as required under 37 C.F.R. 1.2 ) Tj
103 Tz
0.00 -27.35 TD
(regarding oral interviews unless the Office keeps records of the substance of the interviews. ) Tj
108 Tz
0.20 -27.40 TD
(M.P.E.P. 713.04 \("The action of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office cannot be based ) Tj
103 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(exclusively on the written record in the Office if that record is itself incomplete through the ) Tj
111 Tz
0.00 -27.80 TD
(failure to record the substance of interviews."\). First, the Examiners must, and in these ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -27.40 TD
(reexaminations have, complete interview summaries identifying the substance discussed during ) Tj
110 Tz
0.00 -28.55 TD
(the interviews. M.P.E.P 713.04; ) Tj
/F86 12.00 Tf
107 Tz
185.55 0.95 TD
(Ex Parte ) Tj
/F85 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
50.65 0.50 TD
(Reexamination Interview Summaries, attached ) Tj
109 Tz
-235.95 -27.85 TD
(hereto as Exhibits 8-11. There is a similar requirement for the patent owner to submit an ) Tj
111 Tz
0.50 -28.05 TD
(interview summary, which Apple has filed in each of these cases. 37 C.F.R. ) Tj
/F86 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
425.05 0.95 TD
(1.560\(b\); ) Tj
/F85 12.00 Tf
108 Tz
-424.60 -28.10 TD
(Statements of Substance of the Interviews, attached hereto as Exhibits 12-15. Further, the ) Tj
104 Tz
-.45 -27.85 TD
(Examiners must ensure that the patent owner's statements of substance of the interview are ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.35 TD
(accurate, M.P.E.P. 713.04, and the Examiners have not objected to or corrected the content of ) Tj
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Apple's statements of substance of the interviews in any of the reexaminations. In addition to the ) Tj
108 Tz
0.20 -27.35 TD
(interview summary, the file wrappers in the Reexamination also contain the detailed slide ) Tj
99 Tz
37.70 -62.15 TD
(' Interviews have not been conducted for reexaminations Control Nos. 90/010,969 and ) Tj
98 Tz
-37.20 -29.05 TD
(90/010,970. ) Tj
123 Tz
222.00 -54.95 TD
(-10- ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
58 0 obj
<<
/Length 123 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x;0w-0~k%XWQd (8Q&wf>
endobj
60 0 obj
<<
/Length 126 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
61 0 obj
<<
/Length 127 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im90 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im91 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F92 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
73.90 707.30 TD
(presentations, attached hereto as Exhibits 16-19, that were used during the interviews. And most ) Tj
100 Tz
0.75 -27.60 TD
(significantly, each interview was followed by Apple's written Responses to the Office actions, ) Tj
100 Tz
-.25 -27.40 TD
(and it was these submissions to the Office that constitute Apple's official, formal response to the ) Tj
99 Tz
-.25 -27.80 TD
(rejections raised by the Office in these reexaminations. 37 C.F.R. 1.560\(b\) \("An interview does ) Tj
0.25 -27.85 TD
(not remove the necessity for response to Office actions as specified in 1.111."\). ) Tj
100 Tz
36.95 -27.15 TD
(Second, even assuming this written evidence of the interviews were insufficient, Nokia ) Tj
101 Tz
-36.70 -27.35 TD
(can depose several non-attorneys who were present at the interviews, including the examiners ) Tj
99 Tz
0.25 -28.05 TD
(and the inventors, but Nokia has not done this. ) Tj
108 Tz
36.45 -26.90 TD
(In short, all nonprivileged information Nokia may contend it needs concerning the ) Tj
104 Tz
-36.45 -27.85 TD
(reexaminations is already available in the file wrappers or through non-attorney witnesses. ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.85 TD
(Under the Shelton standard, Nokia is not entitled to depose the Apple Attorneys. ) Tj
/F93 12.00 Tf
76 Tz
37.20 -28.55 TD
(C. ) Tj
2000 Tz
9.10 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
94 Tz
27.10 1.20 TD
(The Information Nokia Seeks Is Neither Relevant Nor Crucial ) Tj
/F92 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
-36.45 -25.45 TD
(To depose an opposing party's counsel, the information sought must be both relevant and ) Tj
98 Tz
-36.25 -28.80 TD
(crucial to the case. ) Tj
/F94 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
95.50 0.50 TD
(Shelton, ) Tj
/F92 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
43.00 0.95 TD
(805 F.2d at 1327. Here, the information Nokia seeks to obtain from ) Tj
102 Tz
-138.75 -27.85 TD
(the Apple Attorneys that is not already in the file wrappers of the patents is not relevant and, ) Tj
100 Tz
0.00 -28.55 TD
(thus, not crucial to Nokia's case. ) Tj
112 Tz
36.50 -26.65 TD
(Nokia has not pled any inequitable-conduct defense in this case, so the mental ) Tj
99 Tz
-35.75 -28.05 TD
(impressions of the Apple Attorneys are not relevant. ) Tj
/F94 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
259.90 0.70 TD
(See, e.g., ResQNet.com) Tj
99 Tz
111.85 0.50 TD
(, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc., ) Tj
/F92 12.00 Tf
103 Tz
-372.25 -29.30 TD
(No. 01 Civ. ) Tj
/F94 12.50 Tf
92 Tz
65.05 0.25 TD
(3578, ) Tj
/F92 12.00 Tf
102 Tz
31.65 0.50 TD
(2004 WL 1627170, at ) Tj
87 Tz
115.70 3.80 TD
(*4 ) Tj
107 Tz
10.55 -3.10 TD
( \(S.D.N.Y. July 1, 2004\) \(finding that when the ) Tj
104 Tz
-222.45 -27.85 TD
(plaintiff had not pled inequitable conduct and even alleged the prior art was concealed, the ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(plaintiff was not entitled to oppose plaintiffs counsel on the topic of inequitable conduct\). ) Tj
100 Tz
36.95 -27.35 TD
(Indeed, the only area of inquiry that Nokia attorneys could identify as possibly relevant ) Tj
101 Tz
-36.25 -27.85 TD
(and nonprivileged on which it wished to depose the Apple Attorneys was the communications ) Tj
99 Tz
-.25 -27.60 TD
(between the Apple Attorneys and the Office, including the substance of the in-person interviews. ) Tj
94 Tz
222.00 -37.45 TD
(- 11 - ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
62 0 obj
<<
/Length 128 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x;0w-0~k%XWQd (8Q&wf>
endobj
64 0 obj
<<
/Length 131 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
65 0 obj
<<
/Length 132 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im98 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im99 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F100 12.00 Tf
109 Tz
74.65 708.50 TD
(As explained above, that information is already available through other sources, and any ) Tj
101 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(information relevant to patentability is found in the file wrapper of the patents. Thus, because ) Tj
104 Tz
-.50 -27.85 TD
(Nokia has failed to identify any relevant topics, much less crucial topics, depositions of the ) Tj
99 Tz
0.50 -27.85 TD
(Apple Attorneys in the reexaminations are not appropriate under the ) Tj
/F101 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
330.70 0.95 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F100 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
39.85 0.00 TD
(standard. ) Tj
/F102 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
-334.80 -29.25 TD
(D. ) Tj
2000 Tz
10.80 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
93 Tz
25.45 1.20 TD
(Nokia Will Encounter Privileged Information by Deposing the Apple Attorneys ) Tj
/F100 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
-35.55 -26.40 TD
(Under the ) Tj
/F101 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
54.00 0.00 TD
(Shelton ) Tj
/F100 12.00 Tf
101 Tz
41.55 1.20 TD
(standard, a deposition of an opposing party's counsel is appropriate ) Tj
100 Tz
-131.55 -28.60 TD
(only when the information sought is nonprivileged. ) Tj
/F101 12.00 Tf
94 Tz
259.95 0.75 TD
(Shelton, ) Tj
/F100 12.00 Tf
101 Tz
43.65 0.45 TD
(805 F.2d at 1327. There is a high ) Tj
-303.60 -28.05 TD
(likelihood that Nokia will encounter privileged information if it deposes the Apple Attorneys. ) Tj
100 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Aside from the items in the file histories of the patents, nearly everything known by the Apple ) Tj
101 Tz
0.00 -27.35 TD
(Attorneys is protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. For example, ) Tj
100 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(internal attorney-to-attorney discussions, draft papers, attorney's mental impressions about the ) Tj
107 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(patents and the prior art, and communications with the client are all clearly protected from ) Tj
104 Tz
0.25 -27.60 TD
(disclosure. Nokia will learn little, if any, information about the reexaminations through the ) Tj
99 Tz
0.00 -27.60 TD
(Apple Attorneys without running afoul of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product limits ) Tj
98 Tz
0.25 -28.60 TD
(on disclosure. ) Tj
100 Tz
36.45 -26.15 TD
(In sum, Nokia will encounter privileged information if it deposes Apple's Counsel in the ) Tj
99 Tz
-36.45 -28.30 TD
(reexaminations, and thus such depositions are not appropriate. ) Tj
124 Tz
223.20 -229.70 TD
(-12- ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
66 0 obj
<<
/Length 133 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x0Ca(kUҪ$L>Fby
# Z^ѬlvQu`E)cTn1<>irp)5f6vyba
endstream
endobj
67 0 obj
<<
/XObject 134 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 135 0 R
>>
endobj
68 0 obj
<<
/Length 136 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
69 0 obj
<<
/Length 137 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im106 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im107 Do Q
q
433.92 0.00 0.00 42.24 107.52 648.96 cm
0.15 0.16 0.15 rg
/Im108 Do Q
q
51.84 0.00 0.00 32.64 324.48 458.88 cm
0.20 0.27 0.40 rg
/Im109 Do Q
q
149.76 0.00 0.00 71.04 320.64 460.80 cm
0.30 0.39 0.64 rg
/Im110 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F111 12.00 Tf
93 Tz
74.15 678.50 TD
(IV. ) Tj
2000 Tz
14.90 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
/F112 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
22.30 0.20 TD
(Conclusion ) Tj
/F113 11.50 Tf
101 Tz
-.25 -24.95 TD
(For the foregoing reasons, it is respectfully requested that this Court quash the deposition ) Tj
-36.00 -27.35 TD
(subpoenas of the Apples Attorneys and issue a protective order forbidding Nokia from deposing ) Tj
-.45 -28.55 TD
(the Apple Attorneys. ) Tj
100 Tz
36.70 -54.75 TD
(Dated: May 17, 2011 ) Tj
2000 Tz
100.10 0.25 TD
(\t) Tj
100 Tz
116.15 0.75 TD
(Respectfully Submitted, ) Tj
99 Tz
0.70 -82.60 TD
(Sterne) Tj
144 Tz
25.45 0.00 TD
(--) Tj
100 Tz
10.55 0.25 TD
(Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. ) Tj
101 Tz
-36.45 -13.65 TD
(David K.S. Cornwell \(Bar ID: 431216\) ) Tj
100 Tz
0.00 -13.95 TD
(Byron L. Pickard \(Bar ID: ) Tj
/F111 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
129.35 0.25 TD
(499545\) ) Tj
/F113 11.50 Tf
100 Tz
-128.15 -13.90 TD
(1100 New York Avenue, N.W. ) Tj
-.95 -13.95 TD
(Washington, DC 20005 ) Tj
101 Tz
0.00 -13.90 TD
(202.371.2600 ) Tj
113 Tz
0.20 -13.70 TD
(dcornwellskgf.com ) Tj
34 Tz
102.75 0.00 TD
( ) Tj
114 Tz
-102.95 -13.65 TD
(bpickardskgf.com ) Tj
34 Tz
96.95 0.00 TD
( ) Tj
101 Tz
-96.50 -27.60 TD
(Counsel for Apple Attorneys ) Tj
/F113 3.00 Tf
301 Tz
-29.75 -299.30 TD
(-) Tj
/F113 11.50 Tf
93 Tz
7.90 0.00 TD
(13 - ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
70 0 obj
<<
/Length 138 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x0[Ba5 \AO6
NFTȫ{鑯/ |$M41eiN3|S||r
WZ.ws-XL&;J~a
endstream
endobj
71 0 obj
<<
/XObject 139 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/Font 140 0 R
>>
endobj
72 0 obj
<<
/Length 141 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
73 0 obj
<<
/Length 142 0 R
>>
stream
q
q
612.48 0.00 0.00 792.96 0.00 0.00 cm
/Im117 Do Q
q
612.24 0.00 0.00 792.72 0.00 0.24 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im118 Do Q
q
213.12 0.00 0.00 97.92 67.20 554.88 cm
0.16 0.16 0.16 rg
/Im119 Do Q
q
5.76 0.00 0.00 57.60 0.00 147.84 cm
0.85 0.85 0.85 rg
/Im120 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F121 12.00 Tf
100 Tz
194.40 707.50 TD
(IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) Tj
99 Tz
47.75 -13.65 TD
(DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) Tj
100 Tz
-170.15 -53.55 TD
(IN RE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS AD ) Tj
2000 Tz
206.15 0.00 TD
(\t) Tj
97 Tz
51.35 0.00 TD
(Case No. ) Tj
100 Tz
-257.50 -13.90 TD
(TESTIFICANDUM ) Tj
99 Tz
-.50 -27.85 TD
(Nokia Corporation, ) Tj
0.25 -68.85 TD
(Apple Inc., ) Tj
98 Tz
144.75 41.50 TD
(Plaintiff, ) Tj
/F121 8.00 Tf
100 Tz
-36.25 -13.90 TD
(V. ) Tj
/F121 12.00 Tf
97 Tz
36.25 -54.75 TD
(Defendant. ) Tj
/F122 11.00 Tf
104 Tz
79.40 -46.05 TD
(Order ) Tj
/F121 12.00 Tf
98 Tz
34.10 101.00 TD
(Case No. District of Delaware ) Tj
48.00 -13.90 TD
(Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-00791- GMS ) Tj
116 Tz
-264.50 -114.70 TD
(AND NOW, this _____ day of ) Tj
2000 Tz
174.25 8.50 TD
(\t) Tj
125 Tz
102.25 -8.30 TD
(20, upon consideration of ) Tj
99 Tz
-313.45 -27.60 TD
(Nonparties' Motion to Quash Nokia Subpoenas and for Protective Order, it is hereby ) Tj
100 Tz
37.45 -27.60 TD
(ORDERED, that the Nonparties' Motion to Quash Nokia Subpoenas and for Protective ) Tj
99 Tz
-36.70 -27.80 TD
(Order is GRANTED. ) Tj
97 Tz
36.95 -27.40 TD
(SO ORDERED. ) Tj
98 Tz
251.75 -82.30 TD
(United States District Judge ) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
74 0 obj
<<
/Length 143 0 R
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x0[Ba5 \AO6
Ni>
endobj
76 0 obj
10
endobj
77 0 obj
1099
endobj
78 0 obj
120
endobj
79 0 obj
<<
/Im8 146 0 R
/Im7 147 0 R
/Im9 148 0 R
>>
endobj
80 0 obj
<<
/F10 149 0 R
/F11 150 0 R
/Xi0 151 0 R
>>
endobj
81 0 obj
10
endobj
82 0 obj
2253
endobj
83 0 obj
121
endobj
84 0 obj
<<
/Im17 152 0 R
/Im16 153 0 R
/Im15 154 0 R
>>
endobj
85 0 obj
<<
/F18 155 0 R
/Xi1 151 0 R
/F19 156 0 R
>>
endobj
86 0 obj
10
endobj
87 0 obj
3120
endobj
88 0 obj
120
endobj
89 0 obj
<<
/Im25 157 0 R
/Im24 158 0 R
/Im23 159 0 R
>>
endobj
90 0 obj
<<
/F26 160 0 R
/F27 161 0 R
/F28 162 0 R
/Xi2 151 0 R
>>
endobj
91 0 obj
10
endobj
92 0 obj
3979
endobj
93 0 obj
121
endobj
94 0 obj
<<
/Im34 163 0 R
/Im33 164 0 R
/Im32 165 0 R
>>
endobj
95 0 obj
<<
/F36 166 0 R
/F35 167 0 R
/Xi3 151 0 R
>>
endobj
96 0 obj
10
endobj
97 0 obj
2956
endobj
98 0 obj
121
endobj
99 0 obj
<<
/Im40 168 0 R
/Im42 169 0 R
/Im41 170 0 R
>>
endobj
100 0 obj
<<
/Xi4 151 0 R
/F44 171 0 R
/F43 172 0 R
>>
endobj
101 0 obj
10
endobj
102 0 obj
3318
endobj
103 0 obj
121
endobj
104 0 obj
<<
/Im49 173 0 R
/Im48 174 0 R
>>
endobj
105 0 obj
<<
/F51 175 0 R
/Xi5 151 0 R
/F50 176 0 R
/F52 177 0 R
>>
endobj
106 0 obj
10
endobj
107 0 obj
3809
endobj
108 0 obj
121
endobj
109 0 obj
<<
/Im56 178 0 R
/Im57 179 0 R
/Im58 180 0 R
>>
endobj
110 0 obj
<<
/F59 181 0 R
/F60 182 0 R
/Xi6 151 0 R
/F61 183 0 R
>>
endobj
111 0 obj
10
endobj
112 0 obj
4486
endobj
113 0 obj
121
endobj
114 0 obj
<<
/Im65 184 0 R
/Im66 185 0 R
>>
endobj
115 0 obj
<<
/F68 186 0 R
/F67 187 0 R
/F69 188 0 R
/F70 189 0 R
/Xi7 151 0 R
>>
endobj
116 0 obj
10
endobj
117 0 obj
3510
endobj
118 0 obj
121
endobj
119 0 obj
<<
/Im74 190 0 R
/Im75 191 0 R
>>
endobj
120 0 obj
<<
/F76 192 0 R
/F77 193 0 R
/Xi8 151 0 R
/F78 194 0 R
/F79 195 0 R
>>
endobj
121 0 obj
10
endobj
122 0 obj
3056
endobj
123 0 obj
121
endobj
124 0 obj
<<
/Im84 196 0 R
/Im83 197 0 R
>>
endobj
125 0 obj
<<
/F85 198 0 R
/F86 199 0 R
/Xi9 151 0 R
>>
endobj
126 0 obj
10
endobj
127 0 obj
3455
endobj
128 0 obj
121
endobj
129 0 obj
<<
/Im91 200 0 R
/Im90 201 0 R
>>
endobj
130 0 obj
<<
/F92 202 0 R
/F93 203 0 R
/F94 204 0 R
/Xi10 151 0 R
>>
endobj
131 0 obj
10
endobj
132 0 obj
2565
endobj
133 0 obj
122
endobj
134 0 obj
<<
/Im98 205 0 R
/Im99 206 0 R
>>
endobj
135 0 obj
<<
/F102 207 0 R
/F101 208 0 R
/F100 209 0 R
/Xi11 151 0 R
>>
endobj
136 0 obj
10
endobj
137 0 obj
1770
endobj
138 0 obj
121
endobj
139 0 obj
<<
/Im109 210 0 R
/Im108 211 0 R
/Im107 212 0 R
/Im106 213 0 R
/Im110 214 0 R
>>
endobj
140 0 obj
<<
/F113 215 0 R
/F112 216 0 R
/Xi12 151 0 R
/F111 217 0 R
>>
endobj
141 0 obj
10
endobj
142 0 obj
1587
endobj
143 0 obj
122
endobj
144 0 obj
<<
/Im120 218 0 R
/Im117 219 0 R
/Im118 220 0 R
/Im119 221 0 R
>>
endobj
145 0 obj
<<
/F122 222 0 R
/F121 223 0 R
/Xi13 151 0 R
>>
endobj
146 0 obj
<<
/eCpyDPIY 300
/eCpyDPIX 300
/DecodeParms 224 0 R
/Type /XObject
/Subtype /Image
/Name /Im8
/BitsPerComponent 1
/Width 2072
/Length 225 0 R
/Height 816
/Decode [0 1]
/ImageMask true
/eCpyColor [0 0 0]
/Filter /CCITTFaxDecode
>>
stream
hqD`ά'
\CRd DD~$|@;>$ai#4G!.AqDXA!DnO0@
`Y>'gJFDGDptS6`2Qn;d($A|9~O%3iH@
p<͂Ma`9p0D?p`|9~O/tpɜ:AMOVAovV0#`%90AoaMM2aL;Mi[0uNv>ooI'I}_]߷ou~8oV~8;_I{~ߐcGݍW~Ba>>V?K_?~6 Ȯqҿoo?~!o/?a+3o0
~տ}m{Po}|Cz~kboGF{{Wܗ]užjc]_ߥ)z?iZOcKRK^Ji6+_]l0$M+]K ZiZZ ;KVICa`l@JN,40I8aB
6(6(11AA:JVڄ`44A!G@@q`baX`0R~00`(4L ҟ()v
B&t `#1@Z$""""""# x h0tGN""#QߑF
u25.!V!pt#9fR#Qj>E RA!4
0`SBA\U.D=JmAFN!#2#'1s64P@0~h6)$0 m
L= M}uOZMޗ^Nuoӎ5{88?⮿^J[k_]_~ƿK֗/-[___گo|Bu|}~
߬7ovOϧo~VdK5KZti/ݯuzMom-Nץ}/Km(iki.}[$KV[WM4^[l*la @I0
$Ӄ0 @1AJ*gӳ(Bq 0a`A!@g|B]8ThʑZSDCmE23J
YJ"ȔCA ]r7ɺ(@D,q 7 B/#A6R"tNFvb=E9Ñ\puNa("a6t2H:mI*#u#5 2ψ8 ăh `c&"raa WO D
`2#uANnAPۆM]=ȘD4A
$7[~m&W`p{i}{O[{ӿ{}_ni^{_[K}aۼh΅[w&!NoۭwzޭS"=OK$}xA7_V~W ?z_o.?{]aJu߯C%l5}_>=_v1_&0Qz[~[|%\AlPoBhIa+o)_7nXᵷ[XwoR\7oT,0I˫|{~;z!]'F
ia}qӽ7Kd?}{onu߾?>coio/ooKmV艹-Uޯzl%a}
?WInڄiXRJunoIjM }oKoK۫KKm-wI;I{ !0)v+x_oK
mS
p0!MN8Aa5oAkjj 6@( n0AaB!IUm
ȣBA*~ˍDFmT4ӃB a. = 9AG"r \\+
KGR;"""#SQDDKl"Ȏdl
zY/fPD: !E "h3P/5#tAB#`h50@<'f0idM6O$<8a2aA>H=awӿ
oI__i8h7;Jۯjp7MkX?\(o}l?o&xa_8o}}p]7{\_G7k}[lI.ki-0w$:v /l*x@-a0@˅lb@!828!;aZ @&SaRb"I DDDGQnY0ASh
ܴp6nAkk8 g\60Dr#_"
&hԡ^x15Z'%NOLu_JUQ~vcjtӐA t0D%>ڤZAL!'")z҄(ꥲ(오-L#CD6eP3E5Dl0kaBi8d<"s
2g hocᾓ߶ߧ}߫l*w$C"xqHyh=d@4 3@
3Q4)AT50I<"6B"<"@iSF
"=؏P3h Cߤ~7PA |A[bT%t&}T'K/IdKooۿ&}WL8i뮚[ީ=c?,W\nGaw?7"Ka)o_۫PM?a]iXAa\7},7Xo!Ҳ]cz]v)ݮgua\{vxKK֟]JҶۣO_^W`]}+{iZZwI< uVc$lG86S*ڽ4[j)D$NB:i a0`;IvKBAT0i(A8A ZuPa&6)A KW0C "a 醘P=;)LDDDDDz`Ɉ$4"""""6? Qq"$ϲW]igC"]|AcA(EOoF (_]u
%/ I&~ a+հb|7koJ[կp|}m/l/t[X_[o =~
oF` K@C^|~iv/GKkIcM7Kd/^&uI-^Ӻ^v_o4\a&JTVKKIm6(h$5ON.;1ݻi&AA sa}LvIPbAjȖ&A6(
m![TI0X0SvB!`DC;@("HF,uS??+dtGt,8@v0L xA0d1=¦oO'٤f3|'W7MZ]]{tQ_Rm}{__uNMK`_Zu_*_[ & `
$D i; 3nAq~_A|j `?
endstream
endobj
147 0 obj
<<
/eCpyDPIY 150
/ImageMask false
/eCpyDPIX 150
/Type /XObject
/Subtype /Image
/ColorSpace /DeviceRGB
/Name /Im7
/Width 1276
/BitsPerComponent 8
/Length 226 0 R
/Height 1652
/Filter /DCTDecode
>>
stream
JFIF H H
6# B/2'6NDRPLDKJV`{iV[u\JKkmuSg{ ?00?XXXXX t!
} !1AQa"q2#BR$3br
%&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz
w !1AQaq"2B #3Rbr
$4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ? ( ( ( ( (@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ P:E PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE P@PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ (
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( }(
(
(
(
(
(
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@!j Z(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( (>s@ Q@ g4s@ Q@ P(
( (4P@9E PA 3(
(
( 3@ g(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( v
( CPH: Z( (=( 4P (( 1@#4 tފ (- PE P vZ ( NK@
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( PF{b
;Pړ4 PҔP=h =('b
3@ ( M 4
:qE Z1 P }Mɠ 4( w Rp:P W
- h - h E PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE h PE ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ;P( piE QڀPۚ8 fq- 'ҁJ SE
N :P=i0qրPE /j :QҀ
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( Ҏ w Qڀ- (}A
(
!K@ R{Q@
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( J AE .@<c4=6 ֏
N@ CA
1 c
(s v
( q(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE b ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (3)`8- PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PFy8
( q@'p@x
3 )9sP :g!
(OPw Q @(Ҁ $"GZ QҏԝM ( g :Q CZ ( (
z5r
(
N \
?
3E
qK@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ d\vzP Fhn v {P zQހ =
;Pt
(> ( MN ZZ (4 Q@ s@ Ph ( *@ Q@ !84 Phz Cӊr8 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 3Fh3K@F
^
f.h N)zP )2( 4 b4@
P (P ( vڀ
O ( b
( Q@ Q@o\ 3W(
( PE }( Fh
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( 4PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE S u \\ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ?('ZPs@
,3(l@;i:P B)h Ru PE b
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( ʮPE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PIր= AJ # (h@ij ZZ N ٠ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@ Q@] &Ur
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( E g - Q@49@E f>nR( ?x~tnuzVM2w_>! -S ^<!@OQY 7v /Qo uAIO
>g ?P4Qo- ?iX _Nm ' ?t 4 [@ ? Q ki o A } ??kְ :_kJ OkO֏k/
? OQey _
j V?ͿV K_I ~(?m'Ե?Pk7Ro' @u=B 4˔Q6Z&08=qV- q 4 ڶݸ i??- s 4 jA <O&H?I i nq: )? @ w
? {I?7Qw ~ kh] ߓ@ ϭ4h ߓ@ ??Sy |7P
?y? >W ?| 4 oo Wh{ύ@|n > w | @|. % |w' @ ?O*> >/ *: : t t ~78 >? OO @ۯ?*ϟQ T} Q T }?Um m @˟O } QO } PM # ] 4 } >u @ k t?Ə:_@'OW@گ?i>{ >@o #-i Pǀ )~{ >+ P_?7 //? Z_ϒ | j<